tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21674624.post115391790148616157..comments2024-02-21T05:16:22.788-05:00Comments on Two Weeks Notice: A Latin American Politics Blog: Academic journal reviewersGreg Weekshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15765114859595124082noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21674624.post-1154301839493008352006-07-30T19:23:00.000-04:002006-07-30T19:23:00.000-04:00Perfect!Perfect!Michellehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14769046664779852294noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21674624.post-1154022449096024082006-07-27T13:47:00.000-04:002006-07-27T13:47:00.000-04:00The Quantitative Nitpicker?The Quantitative Nitpicker?Greg Weekshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15765114859595124082noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21674624.post-1153961370220175382006-07-26T20:49:00.000-04:002006-07-26T20:49:00.000-04:00Yes, unfocused works, but usually those that focus...Yes, unfocused works, but usually those that focus on specific points, but ones that are relevant, are easy to address. Those that focus on specific points that aren't really relevant and want you to write the paper they would write, are more difficult to satisfy.Michellehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14769046664779852294noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21674624.post-1153954964686733432006-07-26T19:02:00.000-04:002006-07-26T19:02:00.000-04:00Does "The Unfocused" categoy not do the trick? I ...Does "The Unfocused" categoy not do the trick? I meant that to include people who fail to see your main point because they are too focused on their own.<BR/><BR/>I'm not whether I've adequately covered your second point.Greg Weekshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15765114859595124082noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21674624.post-1153954722251488692006-07-26T18:58:00.000-04:002006-07-26T18:58:00.000-04:00You forgot my favorites...especially likely if you...You forgot my favorites...especially likely if your article is quantitative, and also common at conferences: <BR/><BR/>The person who insists you include their 'pet' variable b/c it's soo important to their work even though it's not relevant to your literature. <BR/><BR/>And, then there's the "knows just enough stats to be dangerous" who question your methods without understanding them or offering a suggeted alternative.Michellehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14769046664779852294noreply@blogger.com