More trade with Cuba
Simultaneously, we have all these farming states wanting more access to
My textbook Understanding Latin American Politics , which was originally published by Pearson, is now available in its full form as Open Acc...
Simultaneously, we have all these farming states wanting more access to
© Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008
Back to TOP
3 comments:
To follow news and information on Cuba, may I modestly recommend the CubaNews list a free Yahoo news group which I've been operating for seven years?
Over 70,000 items from, about or related to Cuba have been posted there, and a searchable database is available to everyone and you don't even have to subscribe to use that.
My father and his parents lived in Cuba during World War II and my interest comes out of that family history.
I totally support Cuba's right to determine for itself what kind of society it's going to have, but th CubaNews list posts material from a wide range of viewpoints.
Thanks,
Walter Lippmann
Los Angeles, California
It comes down to votes. The trade off for Republicans is who it is less costly ticking off: agri-business supported Republican governors/congressman/in farm states or hundreds of thousands of Cuban-American voters in southern Florida.
Guestimating here: the agriculture businesses - as a whole- might stand to gain 300 to 600 million more a year in sales to the island. A lot, but not staggering numbers.
Now the Cuban vote. in 96 Clinton got a substantial number of Cuban-American votes. IIRC over 30 percent. After the Miami meltdown over Elian, Gore got IIRC less than 15%, that was it.
The embargo issue hits home in Miami. Even something as simple as allowing credit terms to the Cuban government can cause a meltdown. Although polls suggest that attitudes among Cuban-Americans towards the embargo have softened, the hard-line exile media figures and community leaders tend to squelch any debate. They are good at drawing a line in the sand, and making an issue like this a litmus test.
In the end US foreign and trade policy are bound to political calculations, more than strategic or economic interest. The agenda is set by a voting block.
I agree to an extent--my impression is that the Cuban American community is less unified than in the past. One factor is age difference. It's true, though, that presidential candidates (and presidents) still see it as too powerful a bloc to antagonize.
In any case, Helms-Burton sets limits on trade, but the Republican pro-business interests are gaining steam in a way we haven't really seen before.
Post a Comment