U.S. Influence in Latin America
I agree with much of William McIlhenny's piece at Americas Quarterly. The upshot: can we please stop with the "the United States is paying no attention to Latin America" meme? I like this bit:
Some will always prefer to wax nostalgic for an era of nominal influence on elites and dysfunctional relationships with undeveloped societies. But that time is gone for good, to our resounding advantage.
True. What was so great about that? Even when we thought our influence was working to our advantage, it often wasn't. Batista and Somoza were our men, and look how great that turned out over the long run. We pushed for drastic market reforms in places like Bolivia to our own detriment. Not exerting such influence may be the best thing not only for Latin America, but for U.S. interests as well.
2 comments:
It's more that Latin America is paying no (ok, less) attention to the United States.
http://incakolanews.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-usas-opinion-of-latin-america-is.html
I agree with you, Greg. The flawed premise behind the whole notion that the U.S. is not paying enough attention to Latin America is that such attention is always constructive.
Post a Comment